[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: [ukha_d] NOT A Bargain] Kodak 3.1 Mp camera for £100
- To: "'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'" <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [ukha_d] NOT A Bargain] Kodak 3.1 Mp camera for
£100
- From: "White, Peter" <peter.white@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 11:21:13 -0000
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
IIRC Argos had something similar a year or so ago, that was widely
publicised and covered by Watchdog. I think it was for a colour telly at
=A319.99 instead of =A3199.99. Needless to say, they did not honour any
or=
ders.
this was however only on the site for a few hours, whereas Kodak have left
it up there all weekend. Presumably their web team doesn't work weekends
(or monday's before 10!)
Pete
-----Original Message-----
From: MIME:mark@xxxxxxx at INTERNET
To: White, Peter; ukha_d@xxxxxxx at Internet
Sent: 07/01/02 10:35
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] NOT A Bargain] Kodak 3.1 Mp camera for =A3100
Grabbed a copy of the site just before it was changed...
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk/images/temp/kodak.jpg
I have the HTML too.
Any "legal" people on this list? My experience of these things -
like
with=20
ISPs - leads me to think they have a "get-out" clause for this
sort of
thing.=20
Seem to remember "invitation to treat" as well - basically I can
put=20
something in my window for sale at 1p but I don;t have to sell it to you
at=20
that.
Another one for the "UKHA Legal Team"?? ;-)
<<ALTERNATIVE.HTM>> <<ENVELOPE.TXT>>=20
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
