[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Bargain] Kodak 3.1 Mp camera for ?100
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [Bargain] Kodak 3.1 Mp camera for ?100
- From: "Kenneth Watt" <kennwatt@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 12:48:25 -0000
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Good point Des, may well be but that's one for some experience in
English Consumer Law!
I've got two of them and two save .html pages confirming it too!
Interestingly no mails from Kodak yet to "say sorry we cocked it
up", so
here's hoping.
This is K. From Work! I really should be working ;-)
-----Original Message-----
From: Des Gibbons [mailto:des@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 07 January 2002 12:39
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] [Bargain] Kodak 3.1 Mp camera for ?100
I just had a read thru my order confirmation email :-
Below is a summary of the items on your order. Please keep this message
as your receipt of the purchase. YOU WILL NEED TO PROVIDE A COPY
OF THIS MESSAGE IF YOU EVER NEED WARRANTY SERVICE.
It is a receipt!!!!!!!!!!!!
I'm no lawyer, but isn't that binding?
DesG
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|