But in this case the TV was =A33.00 - obviously a mistake. To offer a
=A330=
0
camera for =A3100 is credible if generous.
Surely such a major conglomerate as Kodak could take the hit for a
couple of hundred customers?
Don
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Mc Aree [mailto:michael.mcaree@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 07 January 2002 11:25
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] NOT A Bargain] Kodak 3.1 Mp camera for =A3100
>=20
> OK - Found the Argos case.
>=20
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/archive/6632.html
>=20
>=20
> Michael
>=20
>=20
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>=20
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>=20
Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use
this contact form
. Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control
over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed
to the relevant mailing list.