[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: BT or NTL
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: BT or NTL
- From: "Aidan Williamson" <fluff@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 22:05:44 -0000
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Except
of course the NTL has RJ45 out so can be patched in wherever you put
it...
so if
you have a flood wired house the NTL box can go in the main room (lounge
for
most at a guess) and the router anywhere where there's a port, just need a
crossover on one of the patches.
I
currently have no router so the NTL box goes straight to my network card
via a
crossover into the fixed cat5.
A.
If your house is flood wired for cat 5 ADSL has
a
slight advantage: When mine was installed last year I knew that
eventually
I'd have a router at node 0, but until then the modem needed to be in my
study. No problem, the BT engineer installed the ADSL socket in node 0 and
I
used the existing house cabling to patch thru to the study (it's now back
in
node 0 as I got a router for christmas;).
the NTL cable modem
connection is coax, but at half the price...
Yahoo! Groups
Sponsor |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
|
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|