|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
|
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: BT or NTL
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: BT or NTL
- From: Alan Shields <alan@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 21:45:57 +0000
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
If your house is flood wired for cat 5 ADSL has a slight advantage:
When mine was installed last year I knew that eventually I'd have a router
at node 0, but until then the modem needed to be in my study. No problem,
the BT engineer installed the ADSL socket in node 0 and I used the existing
house cabling to patch thru to the study (it's now back in node 0 as I got
a router for christmas;).
the NTL cable modem connection is coax, but at half the price...
Alan Shields
alan@xxxxxxx
On Thursday, January 3, 2002, at 07:39 PM, Ian Davidson wrote:
Hi All
A couple of weeks ago I rang NTL and asked if
they could provide cable to the new house. They didn't know as neither the
address or postcode were yet on there system.
Out the blue NTL rang me today and said yes they
could install. SO the big question is Do I go for BT and ADSL or NTL and
cable. Your views on costs and performance ?
I use a couple of webserver at home (1 for
HA) and stream video and audio (security). I think the ADSL upstream is a
wider bandwidth than NTL's cable but not sure if NTL offer different
packages ?
( I already know some of your views on both
companies, even just checking today's messages ! )
Ian D
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co..uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|