[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: PBXs
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: PBXs
- From: "P G" <psghome@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 23:55:06 +0000
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
yes - I was referring to High Definition (future broadcast video, starting
to appear in a few places, lot of talk about it in the US) and
'uncompressed' at that. HD is actually considerably compressed (at varying
rates) for transmission via satelite/cable. DV is a lot lower bandwidth
(compressed 4:1 in the camea/CODEC etc).
A rather specialist area I admit, but shows where we're heading.
Happy New Year to all!
Paul.
>From: "James Hoye" <james.hoye@xxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
>To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: [ukha_d] PBXs
>Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 23:38:26 -0000
>
>This email was delivered to you by The Free Internet.
>http://www.thefreeinternet.net
>---------------------------------------------------------------
> > You beat me to it P G .. I was going to mention HDTV to James.
Can I
> > also point out that a gigabit really isn't that much, especially
if you
>
>Hmmmm, sorry for any confusion, but I had heard mentioned somewhere (or
>thought I had) that DV output was in the order of 200-300Mbps. Would
HDTV
>be a different beast, or have I just got my wires crossed (again)?
>
>BTW, thanks for the TiVo headsup - actually swiped one from under Phil
>Bargain-meister's nose today at Powerhouse, Winchester :D
>
>Thanks to Phil and Jo for looking after me this afternoon - I've met
quite
>a
>few fellow list members now, and it never ceases to amaze me what a
>pleasant
>bunch you all are.
>
>Happy New Year to all
>James H
>
_________________________________________________________________
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|