[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: Day wasted: Help needed please
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Day wasted: Help needed please
- From: "joaopedrodeoliveira" <p.oliveira@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 17:19:56 -0000
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
*sigh of relief* Oh good! I was hoping not all incarnations of NAT
were as nasty as M$. Anyway I am fixed now but if I EVER have to do
that again I will probably go for one of the available programs.
It's just I put so much time into configuring ICS, DNS and DHCP that
it would be a waste to install another program.
Cheers
Pedro
--- In ukha_d@y..., "Ian Lowe" <ian@w...> wrote:
> Yargh.
>
> That's not NAT, That's Microsoft's Demon Ba****d Spawn version of
NAT.
>
> I think the point being made is that NAT solutions (such as
Winroute,
> Firewall-1, or Linux IP Masquerading)
> are usually much better than ICS.
>
> The NAT built into Win2K RRAS is indeed Hell's worst diablerie, and
not any
> sort of rule by which you should judge the tehcnology!!!!
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: joaopedrodeoliveira [mailto:p.oliveira@xxxxxxx...]
> Sent: 24 February 2002 12:34
> To: ukha_d@y...
> Subject: [ukha_d] Re: Day wasted: Help needed please
>
>
> NAT needs to be configured through RRAS and a lot of options need to
> chosen to get it to work (which I couldn't do) wheras ICS is a one
> click operation. In this respect they are different. It is true
> that they do the same thing but one is highly configurable and the
> other is not - the NOT option is easier and its the one that I
> managed to get to work with the DHCP and DNS.
>
> For those who don't know: NAT can be found in Win2k Server and
> Advanced Server in RRAS under Admin tools.
>
> Pedro
>
> --- In ukha_d@y..., "Darren Henderson" <shmern@s...>
wrote:
> > Small point but ICS *IS* NAT
> >
> > ICS = Internet Connection Sharing
> >
> > NAT = Network Address Translation
> >
> > ICS is just Microsoft's implementation of NAT, Winroute/sygate
> etc.. are
> > all capable of running NAT as well.
> >
> > The benefits of running other NAT software over ICS is they
> generally
> > allow much greater configuration.
> >
> > Darren
>
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@y...
> Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@y...
> Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@y...
> List owner: ukha_d-owner@y...
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|