[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: Day wasted: Help needed please
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Day wasted: Help needed please
- From: "joaopedrodeoliveira" <p.oliveira@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 12:34:24 -0000
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
NAT needs to be configured through RRAS and a lot of options need to
chosen to get it to work (which I couldn't do) wheras ICS is a one
click operation. In this respect they are different. It is true
that they do the same thing but one is highly configurable and the
other is not - the NOT option is easier and its the one that I
managed to get to work with the DHCP and DNS.
For those who don't know: NAT can be found in Win2k Server and
Advanced Server in RRAS under Admin tools.
Pedro
--- In ukha_d@y..., "Darren Henderson" <shmern@s...> wrote:
> Small point but ICS *IS* NAT
>
> ICS = Internet Connection Sharing
>
> NAT = Network Address Translation
>
> ICS is just Microsoft's implementation of NAT, Winroute/sygate
etc.. are
> all capable of running NAT as well.
>
> The benefits of running other NAT software over ICS is they
generally
> allow much greater configuration.
>
> Darren
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|