The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: RE: Wandsworth switch pics up


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Best DECT phones around?


  • To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: Best DECT phones around?
  • From: Paul Boakes <paul.boakes@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 12:37:55 GMT
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

Simon,

I'm not entirely sure I'd agree with that: I have other analogue CLID
phones
which work (flawlessly) on the same PBX: it's just the Samsung that doesn't
(although, bizarrely, I get success about 1% of the
time).

Regards
Paul


----------
> From: "Simon Coates" <ecolume@xxxxxxx>
> Sent: Wed 30/01/02 10:13
> To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Best DECT phones around?
>
> The problem isn't with the phone not displaying CLID, but the PBX
switch.
> Most switches will not pass CLID thru to DECT phones, or any other
> analogue
> phones.  ISDN switches won't pass CLID to any analogue phone, since
ISDN
> CLID is different to analogue CLID.  The only system I know of that
will
> is
> a Panasonic 3+12 which requires a small interface card which decodes
the
> CLID resends it in the correct format.
> The system I'm currently considering is a totally new fully digital
DECT,
> but it's quite expensive - £1400 for the basestation, £1800 for the
> ISDN/analogue PBX and £100 for each DECT handset.  I'll have to see on
> Friday if it's worth it.
>
> Regards
>
> Simon
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Paul Boakes <paul.boakes@xxxxxxx>
> To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
> Sent: 30 January 2002 08:31
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] Best DECT phones around?
>
>
> > <snip>
> >
> > > Samsung also do a really nice DECT phone that looks more
like a
> mobile.
> > > Try http://www.telephonesonline.co.uk/
as they have most DECT phones
> at
> a
> > > good price
> >
> > I have one of these: it advertises that it works with CLID, which
I've
> not
> > managed to get working on a Cybergear Gold PBX.  From what I've
read,
> > Samsung's interpretation of CLID appears to be somewhat of a hit
and
> miss
> > affair (although more of a miss, if you ask me).
> >
> > Incidentally, my brother also had one of these, and never managed
to get
> > CLID working on his BT phone line either.
> >
> > Regards
> > Paul
> >
> >
> >
> > ---[ Note ]-------------------------------------------------
> >
> > This email message is the work of the sender acting as an
individual,
> and
> the views expressed herein are not necessarily those of the company.
> >
> > If you are not the intended recipient of this email message, you
should
> not act on any information contained herein, nor disclose it's
contents,
> but
> should notify the sender by return.
> >
> > ---[ Do you drive a Daewoo? ]--------------------------------
> >
> >
> > For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> > Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> > Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> > List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.