The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: The SWMBO is RIGHT! RE: Power triggering


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: The SWMBO is RIGHT! RE: Power triggering
  • From: "Nikola Kasic" <nikola@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 16:47:57 -0000
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

I agree with Ian.
Even in the most secure and reliable places there is a way to switch to manual mode (otherwise we would be nuked already).
There is no such thing like perfect automation, especially when we are playing with the low-cost devices.
I don't see why it shouldn't be possible to preserve manual functions for all automated things, so when we have homesitters, we leave them in "manual" mode, as they are used to and everyone is happy.
I'm even thinking (to go into extreme) to put one main switch that would switch my house from "auto" to "manual" mode and vice versa, so there's always escape available :-).
Nik
-----Original Message-----
From: BUTLER, Tony, FM [mailto:tony.butler@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 13 February 2002 16:19
To: 'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'
Subject: RE: The SWMBO is RIGHT! RE: [ukha_d] Power triggering


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ian Lowe [mailto:ian@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 13 February 2002 15:53
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx> Subject: RE: The SWMBO is RIGHT! RE: [ukha_d] Power triggering
>
> >Surely though Ian, you won't need a house sitter, because your fully

[...]

> those ten days show my point...

Ian,
Forgive me for laughing at the misadventures you described, but they are
funny to an outsider, and do perfectly illustrate what happens 'when
Automation goes Mad IV - coming soon to Sky 1' :-)  This is the sort I think
I want to avoid, even on the small scale of SWMBO preferring original
remotes to my pronto, her preference for 'real' on/off switches instead of
keyfobs etc....

The key I think here is reliability being ALL important.
Sitters aside, if it ain't reliable, SWMBO won't wanna know.....

> My experience of non-UKHA members in an X-10 house is pretty
> much that: they
> feel totally out of control, as "it" does things around them,
> like it or
> not.

This is why I want to continue having 'normal' switches etc.
EG some luddite walks into a darkened room and reaches for the wall
switch.... there isn't one there - it's PIR controlled.....but the PIR
malfunctions/the HA controller has crashed etc etc.....

Tony


********************************************************************
      Visit our Internet site at http://www.rbsmarkets.com

This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above.
As this e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information,
if you are not the named addressee, you are not authorised to
retain, read, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it.
********************************************************************


For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.