RE: DON'T REPLACE YAHOO!

["Kenneth Watt" <kennwatt@xxxxxxx>]

I don't believe that's the answer, many things relating to say HomeSeer
also
interest me, but I use HV!

K.

-----Original Message-----
From: Nikola Kasic [mailto:nikola@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 04 February 2002 14:38
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] DON'T REPLACE YAHOO!

I agree with Mark.
Whenever traffic becomes too high on particular subject, we can set-up a
new
group.
Also, we can create separate groups on topics like HomeVision etc. so
people
who have HV can subscribe there, where will be images, details etc. related
to HV.
That way, we can keep this one as a general for HomeAutomation and have
additional for particular products (if there is sufficient volume of
messages).
On thei other hand, there is no point having too many groups, because there
is no easy way to check them all via web interface.
Just a suggestion...
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Harrison [mailto:Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 04 February 2002 13:59
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: [ukha_d] DON'T REPLACE YAHOO!
I think we should stay as we are!

- Yahoo! mail delivery option
- Yahoo! web delivery option (albeit cack!)

However, I think that we should also PROMOTE the use of the EXISTING
archive server as the preferred way of READING the list online.

When OT volumes get too high on particular subjects, we just set up new
groups, with the expectation that they'll have relatively short working
lives. (eg epods....)


Mark Harrison
Head of Systems, eKingfisher