Re: Time for cable...

["Andy Laurence" <andy@xxxxxxx>]

From: "Mark Harrison" <Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx>
> > I can't see me needing any of those - mono/stereo is good for
bedroom
TV,
> > and I have a veronica for sound.  Camera may be needed
though.
>
> Yes, but in xxx years time when you get your SECOND surround
processor,
because you can't live
> without DD9.1 and DTS3, where will your current processor go?

LOL, unlikely.  I have the hearing of a doormat.  I wouldn't tell
the
difference.  I do understand your point though - there's always new
things
on the horizon.

> I have various stereo systems around the house of various vintages -
the
oldest is probably older
> than 50% of the members of this list...

I never saw the 1970's, do I count?

> ... Quad 34/306 for the oldies amonst you - relive the glory!

I have nothing older than about 5-6 years.  None of it is high
quality
stuff, but for someone who can't tell a tape from a CD, that's
immaterial.

Andy

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

ADVERTISEMENT

http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx 
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx 
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx 
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
List of UKHA Groups here - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/UKHA_Grouplists/

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.