The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: Re: Cable & ADSL in one network


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: Displays round the house - architecture...



Great idea and something along the lines of the CAN bus system I am slowly
working on. Being CAN bus based, allows you to have multiple masters on the
2 wire network and not have to worry about collisions as you would with
RS485, which is really a master slave network and not suited to
multi-master. TCP/IP on ethernet is another way as this is a multi matser
interface.

Dave...
----- Original Message -----
From: "PatrickLidstone" <patrickl@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 4:46 PM
Subject: [ukha_d] Re: Displays round the house - architecture...


> Some random thoughts:
> An alternative approach is to let each *display* take the decision
> about what to display locally - transmit message text(s) and triggers
> to all devices. (Note that it is the trigger event, not the trigger
> criteria that is transmitted to a display). I can see a number of
> advantages in this approach:
>
> -  There is no cental controller to fail; it is a distributed
> architecture
> -  Triggers can be generated from *any* network connected device,
> possibly including other display units (perhaps with keypads?)
> -  Complex conditional logic can be applied (not necessarily excluded
> with your original design, depends on what the output server does)
> -  Local control and centralised control can be achieved
> simultaneously using the same infrastructure with a minimum of
> additional work.
>
> Configuration information for each display is read from server(s) at
> boot time. This server could also cache recent events so that a
> display shows current information immediately on re-boot.
>
> I think this architecture extends beyond just displays to provide
> (one possible) foundation for an HA network protocol. I could ramble
> on, but I'd wager that a detailed discussion is probably outside the
> interests of the majority of the list.
>
> Patrick




Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.