|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
Latest message you have seen: RE: Re: xAP - The Proposed Architecture Explained... |
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Rackmountable Cases
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Rackmountable Cases
- From: "Chris Bond" <chris@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 20:18:22 +0100
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Can we take this off the list please - just I wanna stay on topic no
one's replied to the originally question yet :)
-----Original Message-----
From: Stuart Poulton [mailto:swp@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 09 August 2002 8:15 PM
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Rackmountable Cases
Hi Chris & Christian
> I am probably going to start a war here, but STAY AWAY FROM the
dual
Athalon
> MB, its still not right yet. I have used several different versions
of
the
> boards ... either WAIT, or go Intel. I have a spare N440BX MB here
you
could
> have - now thats a server board. (Uses 2 x PIII's)
Christian : In what way have you had problems with dual athlons ?
We're using several different variations of the dual athlon boards,
with
Athlon cpus' and even a pair of 1.2G durons, with no problems.
Note I'm not trying to start the war, but am curious about the
problems
you have experienced.
Regards
Stuart
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Yahoo! Groups
Sponsor |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|