|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
Latest message you have seen: RE: USA->UK Transformers at Craplins |
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Sunday HA Session
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Sunday HA Session
- From: "Ian Lowe" <ian@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2002 17:37:15 +0100
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
distributedhomeaudio@xxxxxxx is a pretty good place to boost your
collection.
(eventually! :P )
>I prefer the sound of 192k WMA's personally. Most ppl of course
go for
>256k MP3's.
*ahem*
No, most ppl don't. The quality perception between 128 and 192 is
considerable.
>from
*any* size,
all you are doing is
a) kidding yourself
b) wasting diskspace
I have personally listened to more Mp3s in the last three months for
quality
checking
than anyone else alive (probably not an exageration), and really, the
encode
makes
more of a difference than the bitrate, *every* time.
I have heard some truly *crap* Mp3s encoded at 320kbps, and some
128kbps
that are so
damn close to WAV that it's nearly impossible to tell.
Now, if you excuse me, I'll crawl back under me rock :)
Ian.
Yahoo! Groups
Sponsor |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|