The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: Installing MCE...


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: UPS



IME on XP, IRQ_NOT_LESS_THAN_EQUAL means a device driver has blown up. That could either be the UPS driver having a fit, or a driver for one of the USB devices getting upset when the USB devices power off. Best way to find out is to unplug everything and test powering off.
 
Ray.
-----Original Message-----
From: Stuart Grimshaw [mailto:stuart@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 19 August 2002 10:02
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxxSubject: Re: [ukha_d] UPS

On Monday 19 Aug 2002 9:30 am, peter.white@xxxxxxx wrote:
> IRQ_NOT_LESS_THAN_EQUAL  plus a bunch of other stuff that vanished before I
> could read it.  So I'm assuming that the sudden removal of multiple USB and
> LAN devices has caused XP to crash out.

Could this be a conflict of IRQ's? Not an XP expert but it sounds like
something wrong along those lines. Perhaps the UPS is trying to fire off an
IRQ events to tell the system that the powers gone, but it conflicting with
something?

Just a stab in the dark (excuse the pun).


For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • Re: UPS
      • From: "Matthew Norman" <mafiu@xxxxxxx>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.