Re: xAP - protocol security.

[Stuart Grimshaw <stuart@xxxxxxx>]

On Thursday 15 Aug 2002 2:06 pm, Mark Harrison wrote:
> My view is that most of the messages passing around would be
information
> rather than control.
>
> It would be easy to build a "password" key/value pair into
messages that
> are control-based...
>
> ... however, would be relatively easy to snoop.
>
> The problem is, anything that talks to an embedded device can't use
any
> strong crypto. Therefore needs to be kept physically secure.

I think someone already said it, but if you have problems with people 
accessing your xAP devices you have a bigger problem that you need to sort
out.

Also, I'm not sure what xAP stands for, but if it's x Automation Protocol,
perhaps xIP for x Information Protocol would be better if no control is
being 
done with it? (and  it keeps its nice xippy acronym too :-)

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

ADVERTISEMENT

For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx 
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx 
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx 
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.