The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: RE: New Poll


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: xAP - The Proposed Architecture Explained...



Paul Gordon [mailto:paul_gordon@xxxxxxx] drew:-
> Whereas Multi-drop =
>
> -----+-------+--------+------
>                    
>                    
>      _       _        _
>     _     _      _
>
> And would it also be true to say that electrically, these are
> effectively the same? (assuming the devices are passive)

Ok, love the ascii art, but I'm starting to loose focus on the current
hardware plan.  Lots of things have been discused, RS232, RS423, IP, On Wire
etc, but I'm not sure where everything COULD fit in.  Is each display going
to join the IP network with its own address? Are we going to have a single
Controler that forms the link between all the devices and a single IP
address? Or a single PC that does all the grant work with as any RS232
points as required?

The one idea I don't like is that we will be broadcasting messages to the
whole network eg x.x.x.255, regularly for the displays to operate.  I
appreciate that this would easily allow several machines/devices with
different IP addresses to recieve and process display messages but is this
really neccessary.  I know that the size of messages should be low etc. but
thats not really the point.

In a mad attempt to try and guess the current state of play I'll try my own
bit of ascii art (DISCALIMER THIS IS PROBABLY ALL WRONG!)
   
========++===============================++==== IP Network (Cat 5)
                                      
+------++----------------+   +----------++-------------+
Display Controller        PC 01 (Mail, News, Temp,
Recieves Disp Messages    Weather) Sends Messages .. Other PCs
at 192.168.10.20:1739     to 192.168.10.20:1739  
or 192.168.10.255:1739    or BCast 192.168.10.255
+--------------+---------+   +-------------------------+
               
               
========+=======+=======+===============+====== RS423 (Could be Cat 5)
                                     
     [423/232]      [423/232]      [423/232]
                                     
   +----+----+     +----+----+     +----+----+
     RS232         RS232         RS232 
   Disp 01      Disp 02      Disp 03
   +---------+     +---------+     +---------+

I Look foward to the website that Mark mentioned, and some working protypes
on display so to speak.


Rob
--
     ______   __   _   ______   ______
    / ___  / /  / / __   / _____ HOME: chas@xxxxxxx    / /  /_/ / /__/ / / /__/ / / /__    http://www.kaosuk.co.uk/
  / /  __  / ___  / / ___  /  \__  \            ----          
/ /__/ / / /  / / / /  / / _____/ / Rob Chasmer, MMT Computing
______/ _/  /_/ _/  /_/ ______/ robert.chasmer@xxxxxxx
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please let us know by e-mail reply
and delete it from your system; you may not copy this message or disclose
its contents to anyone.  Please note that any views or opinions presented in
this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of MMT Computing plc.  Finally, the recipient should check this email
and any attachments for the presence of viruses.  MMT Computing plc accepts
no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email.


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.