[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: Power over ethernet and ePODs
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Re: Power over ethernet and ePODs
- From: "Keith Doxey" <lists.diyha@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 19:35:39 +0100
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Hi
All,
2A @
10V = 20W
The
"proper" PowerOverEthernet (POE) specs can supply somewhere around that
amount
of power .....
BUT......
the
way it works is to use a higher voltage somewhere between 40 - 55volts and
then
use a switchmode power supply at the distant end to providfe the correct
regulated voltage. The benefits of this are twofold
1. The
current for a given power is less at a higher voltage
2.
Lower current means lower volt drop and with the higher starting voltage
the
percentage of power lost is much less.
There
are TWO serious flaws with your idea.
1. You
need 2 AMPS - CAT5 is only rated somewhere between 250-350 mA. Admitedly
you can
use 2 wires to double the current rating but you have to consider what
happens
if one wire breaks or a plug has a bad connection, the other wire is then
overloaded.
2. Not
only do you get voltage drop - but if the power supply is grounded on its
0V
rail you also get ground lift at the distant end.
Assuming a 12V power supply and 2V drop the distant end will receive
10V
but this will be across the pair.
The
true voltages with respect to the power supply ground will
be
Epod
0V will actually be +1V
Epod
10V will actually be +11V
Thats
fine as long as no other connections exist to the Epod. But as you are
using
ethernet there will be a 1V offset sitting on the RS422 connection to the
hub.
This probably wont have any harmful effects.
If you
then connect something else to the Epod that has a grounded connection eg
an
Amplifier etc, this will cause the Epod 0V rail (currently at +1V) to be
dragged
down to ground possibly giving a nice hum to the sound. Because the voltage
drop
occurs due to the resistance of the cable and you have effectively reduced
the
resistance by providing an alternative path back to the PSU there will be
less
voltage drop. This means there will be more voltage delivered to the
Epod.
Dont
forget the safety aspect as well, to power 5 Epods you need a power supply
capable of 10A. Connecting a cable with a 250mA rating to a supply capable
of
40X that is ill advised without careful fusing arrangements. It is
effecctively
the same as connecting an electric kettle directly to the incoming mains
feed
with lighting flex!
Keith
www.diyha.co.uk www.kat5.tv
Hi Graham
- it's probably
not a very good idea to try and anticipate a voltage drop down a cable to
reverse engineer the correct voltage at the other end. A few reasons spring
to
mind...
1) The ePods and other devices
take a varying current and it is the current when passing through some
resistance that causes a voltage drop (yep ohms law) and so the voltage
drop
down the CAT5 will vary with what the ePod is doing, the backlight
contributing significantly.When the unit was in power save mode the
voltage may rise causing risk.
2) Possibly the biggest
resistance
in the line would be caused by any connectors that were in circuit but
their
actual resistance may be a little variable depending on physical issues. (I
haven't looked at the POE design to see if there are any connectors in
line.)
Where there is resistance, heat is generated.
3) Not all runs to epods would
have the same voltage drop so you would need different source voltages
anyway.
The ePod appears to require 10V
DC
(an unusual voltage) at up to 2A. Presumably the 2A would be with the
machine running full tilt, all slots occupied and charging the battery as
well. In typical use this may be much less and you might not have a problem
with the CAT5 anyway. What would be interesting to know is if there is
further
on board regulation in the ePod in which case it may well compensate for
any
small voltage losses anyway. Not sure how well regulated the ePod psu's
are.
The technical solution would be
to
have a spare wire coming back from the ePod end that carried no current and
was used to sense the voltage at the ePod end and automatically raise or
lower
the source supply to compensate but again this facility is only in the more
expensive PSU's and would not work for multiple loads. e.g. several ePods.
I would be tempted to try it
and
see, feeding the existing supply through a longish length of Cat5 and
seeing if the ePod powered correctly, it is unlikely to do any real harm to
the ePod (I guess there could be some data corruption potential).What sort
of
length of run of Cat5 are we talking about ?? Avoid connectors if
poss.
The cable will have a spec
somewhere on resistance per metre although there may not be a
guideline to current carrying potential as it is intended for data
signals only. I know people use them for speakers and 2A into 8 ohms would
be
32Watts or 16W into 4 ohm speakers. 1A would be only 8 watts. The voltage
drop
would sort of be ignored though just producing a less accurate sound. All I
am
saying is that 32W of power is more than people are using them for so this
is
pushing it in comparison. How many conductors are available for the power ?
Pairing them if poss could help - I haven't looked at the
article.
I am sure Keith would have a
view
on a current handling capability. 2A is quite hefty
though.
Kevin
-----Original
Message----- From: graham_howe
[mailto:graham@xxxxxxx]
So
the only remaining question is about the power supply itself. Obviously
I don't really want to have 5 power supplies at node zero for the 5
ePODs and anyway I doubt very much that the ones supplied with the
ePODs
would be sufficient over a 50m run. So what I really need is a big
power
supply that can support 5 ePODs concurrently (hence bigger current
draw)
and can supply adequate voltage over 50m of cable (hence higher voltage
to allow for drop).
Does anyone have an idea where I might get a
suitable PSU and also could anyone with the elecronics knowledge tell
me
what spec I should be looking for (I assume it all comes down to Ohms
Law, but I wouldn't trust myself to do the
calculations).
Regards
Graham
For
more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
For
more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx Subscribe:
ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx Unsubscribe:
ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is
subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
Yahoo! Groups
Sponsor |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|