Frank,
TBH, I couldn’t give a fig about
the
size of the odd attachment that is either informative or funny! This is the
two
things that this group excels in and delivers in spades some people take
exception to attachments as a general rule but IIRC I pointed out at the
time
that I saw nothing wrong with this and I still
don’t.
I find this talk of wasted bandwidth a
bit
of a waste of time, all I need to do is count the amount of real spam I get
and
it annoys me simply for the nuisance factor any posts made to this group
generally don’t annoy me except the nit-picking, whining ones which I
do
regard as a waste of my time reading. Yours did not fall into that category
and
I can’t think of many posts on UKHA_D that do! So it takes me a few
seconds longer to download a mail, big deal, like I care!
;-)
K.
-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Mc Alinden
[mailto:armagh@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 25 April 2002 23:05
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] ITV
Digital
Collapsed!
Could we please have a little bit of consistency
regarding
the pic thing . A few months ago i posted a pic of a clipsal two gang plate
and
was informed quite politely that pics were not to be attached as some
peolpe
may not wish to view them . I believe the file size was about 38k
.