|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
Latest message you have seen: RE: |
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: ADSL vs Cable
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: ADSL vs Cable
- From: Jerome O'Donohoe <jerome@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2002 16:38:54 +0100
- Delivered-to: ukha_archive@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
On 23/4/02 3:14 pm, "Andy Laurence" <andy@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
>> IME the quality difference between Sky and Cable (both NTL and
Telewest
>> digital) video
>> is so vast that you would be *much* better with the Sky
service.
>>
>> Even with the nasty over compression of rattling too many channels
down
> one
>> multiplex,
>> Sky is simply much better..
>
> Ag kak, I was almost decided.
I'll put my recommendation in for Sky/Pipex. Sky is fabulous, never
a
problem..My GF has NTL Digi - crap interface,picture shoddy compared to
Sky,
some 4:3 where 16:9 is available, shocking CS.
Pipex ADSL had been great too - only been down once for 1 minute or two
since wires-only launched.
Jerome
--
"Ready...fire...aim..."
Jerome O'Donohoe, Re-recording Mixer, London.
Yahoo! Groups
Sponsor |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
|
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|