|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
|
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: (ukha_d) RE: (ukha_d) Sky + or Tivo - Newbie question
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: (ukha_d) RE: (ukha_d) Sky + or Tivo - Newbie
question
- From: peter.white@xxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 11:17:38 +0100
- Delivered-to: ukha_archive@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
True, but Sky have been touting series linking since the launch well over a
year
ago, and it's still not working well. How difficult can it be?
Even if it
means employing someone to manually trawl the listings making the
links.
As for viewing 2 channels, I've got TiVo set to record from terrestrial
where
possible (so can watch Sky whilst it records terrestrial), and the
likelihood of
2 Sky channels both showing something worthwhile that won't be repeated
within a
few days was sufficiently low!
I've not use Sky+ apart from at friends, so as I said before, it's all
very
subjective.
Pete
-----Original Message-----
From: MIME:tony.butler@xxxxxxx at INTERNET
Sent: 17 April 2002 10:57
To: White, Peter; ukha_d@xxxxxxx at Internet
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] RE: (ukha_d) Sky + or Tivo - Newbie question
> My reasons for getting TiVo over Sky:
> > * Series linking works
In Sky's defence, it is still new - no doubt this will be ironed out
over
time.
> * Not owned by Sky, didn't want to pay them any more money >
(although they
do
> handle the subs for TiVo)
Not sure how this works, with sky having a foot in both camps.
Know what you mean though.
> * Can pay for a lifetime sub
In an interview with the SKY+ team, this was hinted at as a future
possibility - right now I guess they need to claw back as much r&d cost
as
possible.
> * Box was cheaper
Not initially - it started out at 399, just like Sky+. SKY+ will
probably
come down in price once it's been around for a while......
> On the downside it's not got DD5.1, but then that's what I've > got
the DVD
player
> for, so it doesn't bother me (much).
If the terrestrial channels started broadcasing proggies in 5.1 the it
would
be more of a + for the sky box, but ATM, only a limited no of movies on
sky
are broadcast in 5.1 and they are probably either crap, or you already
own
them on R1 DVD :-)
For me, the only thing that is really swaying me towards SKY+ is the
record
1 channel & watch another feature.
Granted, it doesn't happen _that_ often that 2 sky channels show
something
worth watching - but when it does, it's bloody annoying :-)
Tony
********************************************************************
Visit our Internet site at http://www.rbsmarkets.com
This e-mail is intended only for the addressee named above.
As this e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information,
if you are not the named addressee, you are not authorised to
retain, read, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it.
********************************************************************
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message:
ukha_d@xxxxxxx Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx List owner:
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
.
Yahoo! Groups
Sponsor |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
|
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|