The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home

Group Home

Search Archive
Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Cat5 or Cat5e for structured cabling

To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Cat5 or Cat5e for structured cabling
From: <umar@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2002 10:21:01 +0100
Delivered-to: ukha_archive@xxxxxxx
Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
References: <1AD05C34099CE048B5881A7852C61DE0E4CF42@xxxxxxx>
Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

>> Umar, Run bigger ducting than you need, and puts several runs of _String_ in. That way, in 5 years time, if fibre does become the thing to have, you can pull it through with the string relatively easily. >> Cheers - any views on cat5 or cat5e ? --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.344 / Virus Database: 191 - Release Date: 02/04/2002

Yahoo! Groups Sponsor

For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service. References: RE: Cat5 or Cat5e for structured cabling From: "Mark Harrison" <Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx> Prev by Date: RE: Cat5 or Cat5e for structured cabling Next by Date: RE: Cat5 or Cat5e for structured cabling Previous by thread: RE: Cat5 or Cat5e for structured cabling Next by thread: RE: Cat5 or Cat5e for structured cabling Index(es): Date Thread Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.