The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: eBoxit



Ian, I haven't looked at their software so this is a generic answer.

It's actually very easy to charge for a GPL product [based on one time fee = or per user]. All you need to do is have a single piece of proprietory code=
or application and you make the charge for that. That would normally be the= custom interface that makes it easier to use than a bash shell and vi :-)<= BR>
And yes source code must be made available for any gpl'ed packages, but obv= iously not for the proprietory stuff. It is important to note however, that=
the code does not need to be released with the install disks, or even made = available for download from their site ... it simply has to be *available*.=
They can quite happily insist you contact them in writing with a small fee = for copying and distributions of up to =A310 to =A315.

Does any of that answer your question, or even make sense? ;-)

On 2 Apr 2002 at 18:01, Ian Lowe wrote:

> er...
>
> If it's mandrake based, how can they place a charge per user on it? > Surely they have to distrib the source code too?
>
> and the GPL should mean that it's free to re-distribute?
>
> Ian.
>

--
Calum Morrell
http://www.drochaid.info


Yahoo! Groups Spons= or
ADVERTISEMENT
3D"Click
3D""

For more information: http://www= .automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

  • Follow-Ups:
    • RE: eBoxit
      • From: "Calum Morrell" <calum@xxxxxxx>
  • References:
    • eBoxit
      • From: Steve B <steve@xxxxxxx>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.