[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: Enough CAT5?
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Re: Enough CAT5?
- From: "Timothy Morris" <timothy.morris@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:56:58 +0100
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keith Doxey [mailto:ukha@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 28 September 2001 15:20
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: [ukha_d] Re: Enough CAT5?
>
>
> I respectfully refer you to the recent case of
>
> Phil "Bargain" Harris vs. Neighbours Video Sender.
>
> As wireless kit becomes cheaper its popularity will grow.
> More users for the same spectrum means more problems.
>
> How long would your helicopter stay airborne if 500 people turned up
> to fly theirs ?
If I got there first, until I decided to go home. We have strict frequency
control - you aren't allowed to switch on until you have the channel peg
clipped to your antenna ;-)
I do undersatand where you are coming from though. We are limited to 25
fliers at a time though (but we only have enough airspace for around 6).
>
> I rest my case.
>
> Keith aka Katman :-)
Thing is Keith you and Mark et al are "hardcore". For the
majority of us
wireless will be able to do the trick, including sending wireless audio and
video broadcasts throughout the house. You do have 11 channels to choose
from for interference rejection - not my fault that Phil can't work his kit
:-)
Tim.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|