The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Re: What's Santa going to bring you?


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: Re: What's Santa going to bring you?
  • From: "Phil Harris" <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 21:10:24 +0100
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx


Well ... if you want to email me (or cut them to CD if they're big) a pic
or
two I'll run you off some prints...

Phil

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Powell [mailto:ukha@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 26 September 2001 20:45
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: What's Santa going to bring you?
>
>
>
> Holland :(
>
> Andy
>
> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********
>
> On 26/09/01 at 18:47 Phil Harris wrote:
>
> >Where are you based Andy?
> >
> >Phil
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Andy Powell [mailto:ukha@xxxxxxx]
> >> Sent: 25 September 2001 20:27
> >> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> >> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: What's Santa going to bring you?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 24/09/01 at 17:31 Phil Harris wrote:
> >>
> >> >The 1290 is a cracking printer ... I have one that I use
only
> for photo
> >> >prints.
> >>
> >> Yep, that's what I want it for. I went to the camera shop on
> >> Saturday to pick up some prints from my digital camera (they
do
> >> it on proper photo paper) the standard sized are great but
what
> >> really blew me away was the when I got my A4 ones! Out
f*$k%^g
> >> standing, I really mean it they look as good (to me) as *any*
> >> photo and a lot better than APS, which is grainy poo, to
Boot!
> >>
> >> (these are my personal opinions only, I'm fully aware that
'real'
> >> photo quality is actually better - but I can't tell the
> >> difference so to all intents and porpoises (down flipper
down)
> >> they are the same to me)
> >>
> >> There are two big problems with getting it done in a proper
photo
> >> shop though. first is cost (A4 @ 8.45 NLG ~ = 2.41 GBP
each!!!)
> >> and the fact that they obviously don't use any sort of
> >> intelligence when it comes to cutting them to size... I've
> >> attempted to fix this problem buy enlarging the canvas in
> >> Paintshop Pro and then sending them the picture (with some
'white
> >> space' around the image) hopefully when I get them back
they'll
> >> have the whole picture, and if I'm a little unlucky a little
bit
> >> of white around the edges...
> >>
> >> I've not seen much real output on this printer, so any info
would
> >> be great, because of the cost, delay and the 'cutting peoles
> >> heads off' thing I'm really tempted to do this. Plus the wife
is
> >> very interested in doing it ourselves. i suppose if the
output is
> >> good enough then even if it's a little more expensive the
fact
> >> that it can be done there and then, and I can adjust what/who
> >> gets cut off then it'd be better.
> >>
> >> The ultimate question is can you tell at A4 the difference
> >> between a 1290 version and one done in a photo shop (apart
from
> >> the paper of course)
> >>
> >> Andy
> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Homevision (No chance)
> >> >> Pronto Pro (yeah right)
> >> >> Bigger TV (Plasma??) minimum 32in (even less of a
chance!)
> >> >> Epson 1290 colour printer (distinct possibility)
> >> >>
> >> >> Andy
> >> >>
>
>
> --- Tag-it! v2.0 (c) Andy Powell 1998
>
> Soylent Green is made out of Tribbles!
>
>
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.