The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: OnDigital Signal Breakup...


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: OnDigital Signal Breakup...
  • From: "Phil Harris" <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 17:57:17 +0100
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

It's worth a shot ...

Phil

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Squirrell [mailto:msq@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 21 September 2001 17:46
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] OnDigital Signal Breakup...
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ian Oliver" <ioliver.lists@xxxxxxx>
> To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 2:46 PM
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] OnDigital Signal Breakup...
>
>
> > CT100.  But despite a new aerial, new CT100 direct to STB, new
> connectors,
> > big numbers on the meters (aerial installers and box's) and fancy
mains
> > filter I still get breakup.  TBH I think it's part of the
offering. :-(
>
> Another source of breakup can actually be too strong a signal. Some of
the
> Ondigital boxes don't seem to cope very well with a strong signal so
it
> might be worth trying an attenuator to reduce the signal. I've no
> experience
> on this myself but it has helped a lot of people on an Ondigital list
I
> subscribe to.
>
> Matt
>
>
>
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.