[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: OnDigital Signal Breakup...
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: OnDigital Signal Breakup...
- From: "Phil Harris" <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2001 17:57:17 +0100
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
It's worth a shot ...
Phil
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Squirrell [mailto:msq@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 21 September 2001 17:46
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] OnDigital Signal Breakup...
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ian Oliver" <ioliver.lists@xxxxxxx>
> To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
> Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 2:46 PM
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] OnDigital Signal Breakup...
>
>
> > CT100. But despite a new aerial, new CT100 direct to STB, new
> connectors,
> > big numbers on the meters (aerial installers and box's) and fancy
mains
> > filter I still get breakup. TBH I think it's part of the
offering. :-(
>
> Another source of breakup can actually be too strong a signal. Some of
the
> Ondigital boxes don't seem to cope very well with a strong signal so
it
> might be worth trying an attenuator to reduce the signal. I've no
> experience
> on this myself but it has helped a lot of people on an Ondigital list
I
> subscribe to.
>
> Matt
>
>
>
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|