[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Now : The "L" Word, Was: Crazy concept
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Now : The "L" Word, Was: Crazy
concept
- From: "Mark McCall" <mark@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2001 19:59:35 +0100
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Once the Epod is "freed" by 802.11b and Terminal Services it's
amazing!
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk/images/epod_digiguide.jpg
M.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Harris [mailto:phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 12 September 2001 19:38
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: Now : The "L" Word, Was: [ukha_d] Crazy concept
>
>
>
> Aesthetically a touchscreen laptop will always be a touchscreen laptop
> whereas an ePod is a tablet ... easier to "mistake" for not
being a
> computer.
>
> For my desired use (as a grown up Pronto) the fact that an ePod has no
> whirring hard disc and fans is a real plus too...
>
> It has a good eight hours untethered use on its batteries...
>
> I'm sure there are others if I think about it...
>
> Phil
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mick Furlong [mailto:dorsai@xxxxxxx]
> > Sent: 12 September 2001 18:58
> > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: Now : The "L" Word, Was: [ukha_d] Crazy
concept
> >
> >
> > Phil
> >
> > apart from the need to reboot and the lack of instant on (both of
> > which can
> > be overcome) how does an epod score over a touchscreen laptop?
> >
> > Cheers
> > Mick
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Phil Harris [mailto:phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: 12 September 2001 17:55
> > > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Now : The "L" Word, Was: [ukha_d] Crazy
concept
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Yup .... *L*eave it alone and get an ePod.
> > >
> > > *grin*
> > >
> > > Phil
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Graham Howe [mailto:graham@xxxxxxx]
> > > > Sent: 12 September 2001 12:45
> > > > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Crazy concept
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > As I understand it the WinCE operating system is
processor
> > specific so I
> > > > wouldn't have thought it was available for an intel
machine. Also
> > > > the OS is
> > > > usually stored in ROM which I guess is not seen the
same way as
> > > > hard disks.
> > > > Why not use windows 95 with a scheduled reboot every
night, that
> > > > should make
> > > > it pretty reliable (others will no doubt mention the L
word so
> > > I'll leave
> > > > them to it ;-).
> > > >
> > > > Graham
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> > > > Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > > Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> > > > Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> > > > List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> > > Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> > > Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> > > List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> > Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> > Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> > List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|