[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: OT - Digital Cameras
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: OT - Digital Cameras
- From: "Timothy Morris" <timothy.morris@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 08:41:52 +0100
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
We're all fairly logical on this list so:
A 600 dpi inkjet (3 colours CMY), actually prints at a resolution of 200
lpi
(lines per inch - a typesetters convention).
Unless you want your printer driver to do the interpolation - which they
aren't very good at - you should always size your final image to this
resolution.
High end image editing programs like Photoshop, do have intelligent
resizing
algorithms, but again image resolution is lost if you increase picture size
by more than about 20%.
The big advantage with digital photography is that you tend to take far
more
pictures than you would with film, and be more selective in terms of what
you print (much like enthusiatic amatuers and pros do with film). As a
result when you do print, you tend to want larger size prints.
I'm sure before long 3mp will be available in the IXUS form factor. Just
think carefully before you plump for a 2mp camera as to what size prints
you
really want. Of course if all you want to do is store pictures on the PC
and
use it to "show slides" then 2mp is more than adequate.
Don't delete the orginal image from your hard drive once the ink has dried
on the print. The ink (and paper) used in inkjets does have a limited life,
and photos will fade over time when subjected to UV light (though the
manufacturers are working on this)
Tim.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Phil Harris [mailto:phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 05 September 2001 07:46
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] OT - Digital Cameras
>
>
>
> Thing is though Tim most people are happy to go bigger than that
> from a 1600
> x 1200 source ... the mother in law often does A5 from a 1.3mp image
and
> she's happy. A4 from a 2.1mp image looks fine from a distance (say on
a
> wall) but does show up lumpy under closer examination.
>
> If I get chance I'll try to run up some tests at different print sizes
and
> different source resolutions...
>
> Phil
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Timothy Morris [mailto:timothy.morris@xxxxxxx]
> > Sent: 04 September 2001 23:13
> > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] OT - Digital Cameras
> >
> >
> > I can't remember the exact pixel count for a 2.1mp camera but its
in the
> > region of 1600x1200 (very slightly more I think). This limits you
to a
> > maximum print size of 8"x6". If you are happy with that
then
> the IXUS is a
> > great camera.
> >
> > Tim.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Shmern [mailto:shmern@xxxxxxx]
> > > Sent: 04 September 2001 22:23
> > > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > Subject: Re: [ukha_d] OT - Digital Cameras
> > >
> > >
> > > Digital IXUS is a smaller version of the S10 ,Which is the
SAME
> > camera as
> > > Tim and Marks S20 except it's only 2.1mp, I've had an S10
for
> > > some time and
> > > Im very happy with it.
> > >
> > > Darren
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Paul Gordon" <paul_gordon@xxxxxxx>
> > > To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, September 04, 2001 9:55 PM
> > > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] OT - Digital Cameras
> > >
> > >
> > > > Anyone got any opinion on the Canon Digital IXOS
then?...
> > > >
> > > > Paul G.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
_________________________________________________________________
> > > > Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
> > > http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> > > > Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > > Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> > > > Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> > > > List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
> > > >
> > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> > > Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > > Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> > > Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> > > List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> > Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> > Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> > List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|