[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: (ukha_d) Re: Off Topic Posts (Again)
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: (ukha_d) Re: Off Topic Posts (Again)
- From: "Jon Whiten" <jon@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 17:48:38 -0000
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
See inserted comments....
Regards,
Jon
http://www.whiten.co.uk/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Cooper [mailto:steve.cooper@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 31 October 2001 13:18
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] (ukha_d) Re: Off Topic Posts (Again)
>
>
>
> Personally I would miss the OT banter that goes on, which would
> be the case
> if you directly replies directly at the sender.
Me Too...! In my view the whole point of a public forum is that the
answers
are as interesting to readers as the questions. I for one would not be to
impressed with a list that contained only questions - think of it the other
way, what if you got 100 replies, all slightly different, to a question you
asked, but without the respondents knowing what each other had said? That
would be chaos!
>
> The original idea of putting OT currently in use works to
> identify the chat
> but does not address the issue of members that just want to download
the
> high level HA mails.
If we all try and use [OT] in the subject it would help those that do not
want to read (as opposed to those choosing not to download) these posts to
divert them straight to the Trash Can.
> Most OT post are born from genuine enquiries
> therefore once it gets to the point where the discussion has diverged
from
> the main topic it would be better to move it to an OT list. This way
all
> those that like both can set up mail rules to divert both lists into
one
> folder but those not interest can continue to download just the HA
mails.
Banter is what friends do! We are all friends aren't we?
> A natural extension of this is that everyone joins both lists but only
> switches on mail forwarding on the list they want. They can then dip
into
> the OT list by looking at the messages directly on Yahoo without
having to
> download them.
I agree with this, but would still rather have things as they are.
>
> Agree with Stuart G - forums don't work for me either.
>
> S
SAY NO TO ON-LINE (Web Based) FORUMS - THEY ARE
TOOOOOOOOoooooooooooooooooo.............
SLLLLLLLLLLLLLLOOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooowwwwwww........zzzzzzz!
An alternative for those who are only looking for answers! -- Check the
archive!
============================================================================
====
;oj
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|