[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Scanners and Windows XP
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Scanners and Windows XP
- From: "Kenneth Watt" <kennwatt@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 17:45:09 -0000
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
It's fine so long as you do not want to do anything technical with it,
like, emm, scan microfiches!
Actually that's an interesting idea, I never thought about doing that,
how feasible is it?
K.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Hoye [mailto:james.hoye@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 31 October 2001 08:38
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Scanners and Windows XP
>=20
> > I have a Canon 650 (the silver skinny one) working
> > under XP no problem, it worked fine with
> > the W2K drivers but there is now a driver
> > update for it. Quality is fine IMO.
>=20
> We've got a 650U in the office. Ebuyer had them for =A352 inc VAT a
couple
> of
> months ago and I was tempted :)
>=20
> Sexy little beast - very compact and draws power from USB so less
leads.
> Quality seems pretty good, although it couldn't cope with scanning
some
> microfiche at the highest resolution - terrible alignment problems -
but
> perhaps that was unfair of me...
>=20
> James H
>=20
>=20
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>=20
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>=20
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>=20
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|