[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: [OT] Acceptable CPU temp?
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [OT] Acceptable CPU temp?
- From: "Phil Harris" <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2001 23:53:01 +0100
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
I was going to say that I'd have to buy a small tub just for the spares kit
for the "crack" of seeing peoples faces when you start smearing
it on a
CPU...
....however given that the last time we bought some it was for DS when he
had
nappy rash then that might be an only too appropriate turn of phrase!
Phil
> -----Original Message-----
> From: K. C. Li [mailto:li@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 22 October 2001 23:43
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] [OT] Acceptable CPU temp?
>
>
> > Artic Silver has a thermal conductivity of greater than 8 W/mK,
> > standard zinc oxide stuff is less than 1 W/mK. A higher value
here is
> > obviously better.
>
> While I agree that it appears to be superior to zinc oxide stuff, the
> results don't automatically justify the use of it on sub 1GHz CPUs.
Some
> of our PCs have been running for years continuously without any heat
> problems. It may be because none of the CPUs are faster than 850MHz.
And
> besides, we have loads of Sudocream left over.
>
> > Of course if your heatsink isn't up to dissipating the heat then
it
> > doesn't matter too much what you use.
>
> True but the reverse can also apply.
>
> Regards,
>
> Kwong Li
> li@xxxxxxx
> Laser Business Systems Ltd.
> http://www.laser.com
>
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|