|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
Latest message you have seen: Light Switch - Spacer |
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: New PC Build (slightly OT)
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: New PC Build (slightly OT)
- From: "Phil Harris" <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 22:21:23 +0100
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
RAID 0 has no redundancy and is simply striping ... however it ups the data
rate significantly and on Toms Hardware they had the data rate up at
75-72Mbytes/sec for any part of the disc surface accessed using four
drives.
The Adaptec (and Promise) cards do support higher RAID levels with the
Adaptec cards supporting on the fly rebuilding of swapped out drives (I
think the promise cards had to be taken off line to rebuild the drive
although they work continue working with a failed drive).
Phil
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Hetherington [mailto:mark.egroups@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 09 October 2001 22:10
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] New PC Build (slightly OT)
>
>
> > I reckon that 4 x 100Gb ATA100 drives running on their own
> > channels on an Adaptec 4 channel IDE RAID card (£250ish) should
> > be more than big/fast enough ...
>
> > Have any of you read the software RAID article on Toms
> > Hardware (www.tomshardware.com)? I can recommend it as
> > interesting reading...
>
> Shame it is only RAID 0 though. I never quite worked out where the
> redundancy is in RAID 0 since one failure is failure of the array
> so doesn't
> seem redundant at all so outght to be AID :)
>
> Mark.
>
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|