The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: Re: Off Topic Posts (Again)


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Re: Rio Receiver in the UK


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: Re: Rio Receiver in the UK
  • From: "Mark Harrison" <Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 9 Oct 2001 14:28:59 +0100
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

Sorry - I meant a "wireless bridge". You have only a single
"access
point".

I've certainly done this joining networks in buildings either side of a
road!

Mark Harrison
Head of Systems, eKingfisher

************************************************************************
****
Kingfisher plc
Registered Office: North West House, 119 Marylebone Road, London NW1 5PX
Registered in England, Number 1664812

This e-mail is only intended for the person(s) to whom it is addressed
and
may contain confidential information.  Unless stated to the contrary,
any
opinions or comments are personal to the writer and do not represent the
official view of the company.  If you have received this e-mail in
error,
please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this
message
from your system.  Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or
disclose its contents to any other person.  Thank you for your
co-operation.
************************************************************************
****



-----Original Message-----
From: patrickl@xxxxxxx [mailto:patrickl@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 9 October 2001 13:14
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: [ukha_d] Re: Rio Receiver in the UK


--- In ukha_d@y..., "Mark Harrison" <Mark.Harrison@e...>
wrote:
> You don't add a wireless _card_. You stick a wireless "access
point"
> into the back, with an RJ45 cross-over cable.
>
> Or, as I'm doing, you put in some CAT5 ;-)

You can't use a Wireless Access Point (in the sense of the bit of kit
that you normally have at the centre of a wireless LAN, which acts as
a bridge) in this way, because it won't associate with another
Wireless Access Point -- AP's won't work peer-to-peer (at least I've
never found any that would, and can see fundamental problems from a
protocol perspective with this approach).

Patrick



For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit
http://www.messagelabs.com/stats.asp



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.