RE: OT: Outlook 2000 rules help

["Mark Harrison" <Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx>]

Jon,

As you guessed, the problem is volume.

My PST file, which only contains mailing list stuff, is on the verge of
going over a Gig - if I kept it all on a server as well, my mail
administrator would get somewhat pissed off at me despite the fact I'm
his boss ;-)

We are trying to persuade our users to have mail boxes no bigger than a
couple of hundred Meg each.

Regards,

Mark Harrison
Head of Systems, eKingfisher

-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Whiten [mailto:jon@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 7 November 2001 18:49
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] OT: Outlook 2000 rules help


Is there a reason for not using an OST file?  You could then use all
Server
Based rules to distribute your mail into folders on the server that are
1)
available in OWA and 2) synchronised with the laptop OST file on
connection.
Each folder can be set to be or not be duplicated in the OST.

The down-side is that you would be storing a copy of all of your mail on
the
Exchange server - is this a problem in terms of volume?


Regards,

Jon
http://www.whiten.co.uk/


For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/