RE: Re: Historic message

["Phil Harris" <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>]

RF is not what the KAT5s were designed to do though!

If you want to distribute RF then use a standard TV distribution amp
available from any DIY shop and do it that way ... it's cheaper than KAT5
anyway!

Phil

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Powell [mailto:ukha@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 04 November 2001 14:58
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: [ukha_d] Re: Historic message
>
>
> > Hi Andy,
>
> Hi Keith,
>
> quick response!! :)
>
> > Thats what the switcher will do, but without the RF input. The
> cost of the
> > bits to build an RF input is more than the cost of a cheap VCR.
As
> long as
> > you could control the VCR being used as a tuner you would
> effectively have
> > that.
> except you'd need a VCR for each location, I was talking 1 rf in
> many rf out each able to watch a different channel...
>
>
> > Also the effort would be wasted as analogue will be switched off
> in a
> > few years.
>
> .. but what if you're modulating cameras etc ....
>
> > Final product....need to do some more testing and fine tuning,
> then get a
> > couple of victims ^H^H^H^H^H^H Beta testers to prove it "in
the
> field"
> > before releasing it on you all.
>
> I was waiting for the IR stuff before ordering, so would gladly beta
> test it for you without any worries.... in fact I *need* the IR
> bit.. to be of any use to me...
>
> *Sitting of the edge of my seat ...
>
>
> Andy
>
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>


For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/