The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: [Project] Project funding


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: Re: [Project] Project funding
  • From: "Mick Furlong" <dorsai@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 10:44:31 -0000
  • Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

Stuart Grimshaw <stuart@xxxxxxx> said:

> On Wednesday 30 May 2001 11:18 am, you wrote:
> > I was just concerned at people shelling out for components out of
their
own
> > pockets when the projects are for the good of the group...
>
> But the components they buy for will be for their own units anyway, 
any
> units made for others will be payed for by that 3rd party, if the
builder
has
> any sense :-)
>

This is difficult and I don't have an answer..there are a lot of things to
take into account such as the cost of non-component items like pic
programmers
/SDKs/PCB etching...they will be used to develop things but then the
purchaser
will still have use of them..how do you calculate the marginal cost? Also
peoples time which no doubt has very varied costs across the group (but
most
pretty expensive I guess ;)

I think if we start to look for funding etc at this stage then we will run
into problems, from my viewpoint I am happy to invest in some items I
personally want to have a go at and if anyone else needs to avail of those
facilities I will do it at cost or for free.

I would hate to see this breakdown because we try to commercialise it!

Mick






Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.