The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Project] Where now ?


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [Project] Where now ?
  • From: "Keith Doxey" <ukha@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 27 May 2001 00:06:43 +0100
  • Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

John,

I'm OK for assisting with PCB design and the company I use for my KAT5
PCB's
are very reasonable. Board quality is excellent. For a Microcontroller
board
is it not practical to make them yourself due to the complexity and large
number of holes to be drilled.

Even for KAT5 I recon that the prototype boards I made cost me well over
£50
each in time, materials and broken drillbits. That was excluding
components.

Just looked at the Rabbit site and realised there wont be that many holes
because its Surface Mount. That makes it all the more important that the
board is professionally produced as the solder resist mask will be
essential.

Keith

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dr John Tankard [mailto:john@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 26 May 2001 22:27
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: [ukha_d] [Project] Where now ?
>
>
> Moving things on a bit....
>
> I am not sure what the next step should be but to get things moving I
> would like propose we pick a device and make a trial unit. Rather
> than picking something with a lot of coding like the lighting
> controler lets start with something simple. What should we start
> with ?
>
> I have done a lot of reading and would like to try using the RCM2200
> as the base micro, the main reason is cost at 34USD for large volume
> they are cheap. I think that most of the devices could be implimented
> on them (perhaps not lighting controler ramping up 4 channels takes
> up a lot of clocks)
>
> The RCM2200 sits on top of a user board, each device could have a
> different user board. It is also very small and will easly fit in a
> uk single gang box.
>
> I think that with a device built we can see where the problems are
> and develop a solution.
>
> I think we need to decide who wants to to what, from what i
> understand we need the folowing:-
>
> Hardware Group.
>    Board design. people who can produce a board design
>    PCB production. people who have etching equipment
>    PCB assembly.
> Software group
>    System coms design. XML
>    TCP/IP coding
>    Sub system coding
>    motherbord coding
>
> What do people think ?
>
> John
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.