[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: ISDN2
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: ISDN2
- From: patrickl@xxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 15:44:10 -0000
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Not quite true.
There is a low bit rate signalling channel which is always on - but
can't be used for anything useful thanks to BT being half-arsed.
Which makes Mark's assertion effectively true.
Patrick
--- In ukha_d@y..., "Mark McCall" <mark@a...> wrote:
> No.
>
> M.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <andy.powell@l...>
> To: <ukha_d@y...>
> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2001 12:09 PM
> Subject: [ukha_d] ISDN2
>
>
> > Sorry for the stupid question,
> >
> > is ISDN2 an always on connection?
> >
> > A,
> >
> >
> > ************************ DISCLAIMER ************************
> > This message is intended only for use by the person
> > to whom it is addressed. It may contain information
> > that is privileged and confidential. Its content does
> > not constitute a formal commitment by Lombard Odier.
> > If you are not the intended recipient of this message,
> > kindly notify the sender immediately and destroy this
> > message. Thank You.
> > *****************************************************************
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|