The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: closed purchasing group list idea


  • To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Subject: RE: closed purchasing group list idea
  • From: andy.powell@xxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 10:43:41 +0200
  • Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

I'm not getting delayed messages (for the first time since I don't know=20
when) but every time I send a message I get 2 back. 1 from me and 1 from=20
UKHA_D..

Does anyone else get those???

A,




Keith Doxey <ukha.diyha@xxxxxxx>
15/05/2001 10:37
Please respond to ukha_d

=20
To:     ukha_d <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
cc:=20
Subject:        RE: [ukha_d] closed purchasing group list idea

Here Here :-))

Keith ....who is suffering from seriously delayed messages at the moment=20
:-(

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Gordon [mailto:paul_gordon@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 08:22
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] closed purchasing group list idea
>
>
> Anything that removes Yahoo from the equation is good by me...
>
> Just one thing...
>
> If this is done "properly" this could be an
>extremely< good
> resource, and a
> good test for the kind of collaberative project working that
> has been mooted
> before. So, if we do it, lets take the time, and care to do
> it properly, and
> not repeat any of the mistakes that Yahoo have made.
>
> just my =A30.02
>
> Paul G.
>
>
>
> >From: "Kenneth Watt" <kennethwatt@xxxxxxx>
> >Reply-To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> >To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
> >Subject: RE: [ukha_d] closed purchasing group list idea
> >Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 22:23:26 +0100
> >
> >I'm game
> >
> >K.
> >
> >  -----Original Message-----
> >From:                 Graham Howe [mailto:graham@xxxxxxx]
> >Sent:                 14 May 2001 22:20
> >To:           ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> >Subject:              RE: [ukha_d] closed purchasing group list
idea
> >
> >I really would like to get away from the reliance on yahoo
> as well. This
> >list has been very flaky lately and I am getting a bit
> annoyed by all the
> >adverts (not to mention a marked increase in spam since the move
from
> >egroups - this could be coincidence of course). I would have
> thought there
> >was some way to get a our own list server set up with no
> adverts, reliable
> >and faster posting and the ability to simply create and
> delete lists for
> >particular discussions. I have seen a lot of sites now seem
> to have some
> >form of 'forums' where an initial page shows each forum, the
> last posting,
> >number of messages etc and this seems a nice feature. If it
> is a question
> >of
> >server space, I have lots to spare on my server which is
> hosted on a 128K
> >connection, but I'm sure others can offer that too. I must
> admit that I
> >have
> >not had any experience at setting up lists but I'm sure
> there is plenty of
> >cheap/free software out there to do that. One thing I
> personally would like
> >though is to get all these 'linked' lists into a common
> place, I don't
> >really want to be setting up numerous accounts, and if there
> was a single
> >web based front page to all related lists then it might prevent
some
> >duplicate postings. Also the ability to search across forums
> would be nice
> >along with some FAQ pages, we might even want to get some decent
chat
> >functionality on there which was not dependent on IRC or
> yahoo or anyone
> >else. I reckon we could build up a nice little resource site
> for ourselves
> >that could further promote HA in the UK. What do you think ?
> >
> >Graham
> >
> >  -----Original Message-----
> >From:                 Dr John Tankard [mailto:john@xxxxxxx]
> >Sent:                 14 May 2001 21:54
> >To:           ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> >Subject:              [ukha_d] closed purchasing group list idea
> >
> >I was thinking....dangrous I know...
> >
> >with all the talk of getting epods, ddar, air con, digital pix,
cheap
> >memory etc, should we create a private list (I can donate a list)
to
> >pool purchasing of said items without it being a public showing or
> >subjetc to our hosts rules.
> >
> >Take the memory prices i listed today, i am happy to purchase on
> >behalf of others in return for simular help, like the ddar's. But
i
> >can see that some suppliers would object about prices being shown
in
> >public.
> >
> >If there is interest i can create a list tomorow. how about it
> >ukha_buy@xxxxxxx !!
> >
> >Any Ideas
> >
> >John
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >_________________________________________________________
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> ___________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
http://www.hotmail.com.




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




=20

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/






*
********************** DISCLAIMER **************************
This message is intended only for use by the person
to whom it is addressed. It may contain information
that is privileged and confidential. Its content does
not constitute a formal commitment by Lombard Odier.
If you are not the intended recipient of this message,
kindly notify the sender immediately and destroy this
message. Thank you.
*************************************************************

=20

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/=20




Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.