[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: KAT5 question
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: KAT5 question
- From: "Phil Harris" <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 13:51:57 +0100
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
No ... Keith's KAT5 doesn't introduce any delays that anyone will ever
manage to notice.
Phil
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Gordon [mailto:paul_gordon@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 14 May 2001 13:36
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] KAT5 question
>
>
> You should be able to work it out exactly, but I think you'll
> find the
> answer will be in FEMTO-seconds (that's 1 over 10(-15) ),
> IIRC light travels
> aproximately 1 metre in 1 femtosecond... (ish) That of course
> is purely the
> speed of propogation of the signal through the conductor, I
> suppose in
> theory, there could be additional delay incurred in the
> active parts of the
> circuitry. (Keith...)
>
> Paul G.
>
> >
> >The signals travel at 186,000 miles per second so I dont
> think you will
> >notice any delay :-)
> >
> >HTH
> >
> >Keith
> >
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> ___________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
http://www.hotmail.com.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|