----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, April 14, 2001 5:09
PM
Subject: [ukha_d] First MP3 results
in - Tim eats his words!
First thanks
to Phil Harris for connecting up the analogue cables on the back of my
DV88 yesterday. I had hoped to use my Meridian 561 to do the decoding
for both CD and MP3, but while the Meridian will decode 5 channel mpeg
(the original standard for PAL DVDs), I've since found out that .mp3 is
a different thing!
I've been
doing some reading, and have used a separate ripper, and encoder - both
free.
For ripping
I used Exact Audio Copy, which recognises errors in the bitsream, and
re-reads the CD until it gets a perfect copy. All of my CDs (with a few
exceptions which have been "borrowed" by young hands) are in pristine
condition, so It may be overkill. It takes longer, but at least I'm
guaranteed that the .wav files on the hard disc are a perfect
representation of what was on the CD. http://www.exactaudiocopy.de/
For encoding
I have used the latest LAME encoder (3.88), together with a windows
front end (Razorlame).
For some
reason the files were unreadable when using high bit rates unless I
selected ISO compatibility.
The first
thing I discovered is that the type of source material makes a vast
difference (I know you all already know this, but for me it is a voyage
of discovery!) I encoded "Miss Otis regrets" from the "Ella Fitzgerald
sings the Cole Porter songbooks" boxed set, which is vocals plus light
piano accompaniment, and that sounded quite respectable down to 128K. I
then did a quick an dirty test on some material with wider dynamic range
that I've been listening to quite a lot recently - the 4th track on Whoa
Nelly by Nelly Furtando, and with this one compression was fairly
obvious at the same bit rate.
Overnight I
set up the whole Nelly CD to be encoded at 320Kb/s, and have just
finished an A/B comparison with the original CD switching back and forth
between the two. There is a very slight muddiness to very low bass,
but you really have to try hard to hear it, and to be fair I think that
has as much to do with the fact that the DACS in the Meridian are
superior to those in the Arcam as anything else.
I realise
that 320Kb/s is too high a bit rate for ripping an entire CD
collection - so now that I have found (for myself) that .mp3 can
produce very good results even when played through a very transparent
HiFi, I'll experiment with various encoding settings to find the best
trade-off over the next couple of weeks and post the
results.
Many of you
may be thinking that it is all irrelevant, as your HiFi/listening room
is not capable of revealing the difference. Well your current set-up
might not, but what if you splash out further down the line? Do you
really want to go through the hassle of re-encoding all of your
material?
I'm not
going to go through the process of ripping my entire CD collection
purely because I'm happy changing a CD every hour or so, and I live in a
single story open plan building so there is no need for multi-room audio
- I just turn up the volume, but it has given me food for
thought!
See Mark, I
said I'd be honest!
Tim.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups
is subject to the Yahoo!
Terms of Service.