The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: =?iso-8859-1?Q?RE:_=5Bukha=5Fd=5D_Acer_Revo_3600's_for_=A3130_inc_VAT?=


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Local CDDB lookups


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: Local CDDB lookups
  • From: "Adam Stevens" <adam@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2001 15:46:44 -0000
  • Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

> I can decrease the
> time it takes to find a disk to about 7 seconds provided I don't
> use the track offsets in my search. The trouble with this is that
> some discids are the same so i could end up with more than one
> entry listed.

How many have the same discID?  You could do a short, 7 sec search, and if
more than one row is returned, do the search again using the track offset?
Of course that would be slower for disks with the same ID as another disk,
but quicker for the others! :-)

Adam.



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.