[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Digital Jukebox
- To: "'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'" <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Digital Jukebox
- From: "Kaye, Mark" <mark.kaye@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Mar 2001 10:30:17 -0000
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Title: RE: [ukha_d] Digital Jukebox
Just having a quick bash at the schema for a comprehensive
Artist/Band/Album/Song database. I have worked out the fairly complex
relationship between Artists, Bands and Artist membership of bands.
Can anyone see a flaw in the following schema (additional columns in each
table could easily be created, I'm more interested in relational problems
with the schema):
Artist Table Table which holds individual
Artist info
artistid
ID of Artist
fname
First Name of Artist
mname
Middle Initial/s or Middle
Name/s
lname
Last Name of Artist
dob
Date of Birth of Artist
height
Height of Artist
Band Table
Table which holds band
details
bandid ID
of Band
bandname
Name of Band
estdate Date of
Establishment
cesdate
Cessation Date
Member Table Table which manages the
relationship between bands and artists
artistid
ID of Artist
bandid ID
of Band
startdate
Date Artist started in
band
enddate Date
Artist stopped in band
This schema should allow for individual band/artists (one
man bands!) and also multiple bands with single or multiple artists.
Can anyone see any major flaws here?
Cheers,
M
Yahoo! Groups
Sponsor |
|
|
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|