[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: OT W2k server & Professional at home
- To: "'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'" <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Re: OT W2k server & Professional at
home
- From: "Murgatroyd, Paul" <paul.murgatroyd@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 13:09:36 -0000
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Doh, I'll have to remember to delete the autosig in future!
Paul
> ----------
> From: Murgatroyd, Paul
> Reply To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Sent: 12 March 2001 12:48
> To: 'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: OT W2k server & Professional at home
>
> Can you not put the Routers IP address as a secondary DNS Server?
> > Paul Murgatroyd
> > ________________________________
> > IBM Global Services
> > Tel No +44 1625 519567
> > Paul.Murgatroyd@xxxxxxx
> >
> > ----------
> > From: Barnett_Ray@xxxxxxx[SMTP:Barnett_Ray@xxxxxxx]
> > Reply To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > Sent: 12 March 2001 12:34
> > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > Subject: [ukha_d] Re: OT W2k server & Professional at home
> >
> > > Bear in mind that a Windows 2000 domain, relies on a DNS
> > Server, and
> >
> > What is the best solution to the problem then? I also have this
> > problem. If I enable a DNS server on my W2K server, clients
cannot
> > perform DNS lookups on Internet machines via the router (because
the
> > W2K DNS server intercepts them and tries and fails on the
lookup).
> >
> > If I disable the W2K DNS service, it works better, but the router
is
> > up more than it ought to be.
> >
> > Is the best/only solution not to implement a domain? I've only
got 4
> > or 5 machines so it doesn't matter too much either way.
> >
> > Ray Barnett.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|