[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: ShowShifter Review
- To: "'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'" <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Re: ShowShifter Review
- From: Mark Harrison <Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2001 13:46:00 +0100
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
I did say "virtually no-one", rather than "no-one" ;-)
Are you using VoIP? We looked at it (in March) for our new office, and
decided that a more "traditional" solution was still wildy more
cost-effective. I don't see wide actual usage before 2004.
Mark Harrison
IT Controller, eKingfisher
****************************************************************************
Kingfisher plc
Registered Office: North West House, 119 Marylebone Road, London NW1 5PX
Registered in England, Number 1664812
This e-mail is only intended for the person(s) to whom it is addressed and
may contain confidential information. Unless stated to the contrary, any
opinions or comments are personal to the writer and do not represent the
official view of the company. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message
from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or
disclose its contents to any other person. Thank you for your
co-operation.
****************************************************************************
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan James [mailto:daniel.james@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 21 June 2001 13:34
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: [ukha_d] Re: ShowShifter Review
IPV6 is being used in Telco, as it offers better QOSy.... and means
VoIP is a possiblity, C&W were looking at it for there backbones.
--- In ukha_d@y..., Mark Harrison <Mark.Harrison@e...> wrote:
> IPV6 is "already there", just virtually no-one has bothered
implementing it.
>
> The "problem" that IPV6 was meant to solve was one of lack
of space
left in
> the IPV4 address space.
>
> However, NAT (Network Address Translation) has dealt with virtually
all of
> the problems that were believed to be there. Virtual Hosting has
dealt with
> some of the other problems.
>
> Basically, it's a lot cheaper to install a load of NAT IPV4 kit
than it
> would be to install IPV6 stuff, so why bother?
>
> Mark Harrison
> IT Controller, eKingfisher
>
>
**********************************************************************
******
> Kingfisher plc
> Registered Office: North West House, 119 Marylebone Road, London
NW1 5PX
> Registered in England, Number 1664812
>
> This e-mail is only intended for the person(s) to whom it is
addressed and
> may contain confidential information. Unless stated to the
contrary, any
> opinions or comments are personal to the writer and do not
represent the
> official view of the company. If you have received this e-mail in
error,
> please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this
message
> from your system. Please do not copy it or use it for any
purposes, or
> disclose its contents to any other person. Thank you for your co-
operation.
>
**********************************************************************
******
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark McCall [mailto:mark@xxxxxxx...]
> Sent: 21 June 2001 11:56
> To: ukha_d@y...
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] ShowShifter Review
>
>
> When's this new IP stuff coming? There's one for each grain on
sand on the
> planet or something like that.
>
> M.
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Michael Mc Aree" <michael.mcaree@t...>
> To: <ukha_d@y...>
> Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 11:50 AM
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] ShowShifter Review
>
>
> > Virtual hosting. Basically there is a finite number of IP
addresses and an
> > infintite number of websites/domains. Therefore something had to
be done
> to
> > accommodate them all. I would have removed all the crap sites
first :-)
> >
> > M
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: James Hoye [mailto:james.hoye@xxxxxxx...]
> > > Sent: 21 June 2001 11:44
> > > To: ukha_d@y...
> > > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] ShowShifter Review
> > >
> > >
> > > This email was delivered to you by The Free Internet,
> > > a Business Online Group company. http://www.thefreeinternet.net
> > >
---------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > PS your site is down at the moment, well it
from here.
> > > > >
> > > > > Fine from here.
> > > >
> > > > Must be crapnet, I still cannot see it from any of my
systems,
> > > > think it must
> > > > be a temporary DNS problem I cannot even ping it
> > >
> > > I can see it OK.
> > >
> > > Here's a question for the TCP/IP experts:
> > >
> > > If I tracert to www.automatedhome.co.uk I get an IP address
of
> > > 216.167.90.227. So if I go to http://216.167.90.227 I get
Laser's site
> (I
> > > know Li kindly hosts Mark's site) - why is this? Just
curious.
> > >
> > > James
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ____________________________________
> > > Automated Home UK
> > > http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> > > ____________________________________
> > >
> > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> > > http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> > ###############################################
> > This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have
received
> > it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or
disclose
> > the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The
contents of
> > this message may contain personal views which are not the views
of the
> > company, unless specifically stated.
> > #################################################
> >
> >
> >
> > ____________________________________
> > Automated Home UK
> > http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> > ____________________________________
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________
> Automated Home UK
> http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> ____________________________________
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
_____________________________________________________________________
> This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
> MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit
> http://www.messagelabs.com/stats.asp
____________________________________
Automated Home UK
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
____________________________________
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit
http://www.messagelabs.com/stats.asp
____________________________________
Automated Home UK
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
____________________________________
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|