The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: Re: 1/2" or 15mm


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Re: [Development] Lights functions required


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: Re: [Development] Lights functions required
  • From: "Dr John Tankard" <john@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 13:06:45 +0100
  • Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx



> I am probably talking drivel but how about some form of mcb?
>

Your not talking drivel, but even the fast versions of the MCB will perhaps
not be fast enough. I quote from the SSR handbook

" Mechanical circuit breakers ore generally too slow to prevent damage
to
semiconductor devices, barely fast enough to protect printed circuitry and
wiring from high short-circuit currents. Standard cartridge fuses are two
slow to protect semiconductors when operating close to their maximum
ratings. However, they can be successfully used if the semiconductor is
severely derated to accommodate a lower value fuse..."

There are some very fast fuses called semiconductor fuses, which blow very
fast and limit the current, but you have guessed it they are more expensive
than the triac.

The same book also lists a example of a 25A device, its operating range:-

100A for 1.00  second
130A for 0.10  second
250A for 0.01  second
725A for 0.001 second

This example is a SSR which are much harder than a simple TRIAC

John





____________________________________
Automated Home UK
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
____________________________________

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.