Re: Protocol Name

["Gareth Cook/STA/Lotus" <gcook@xxxxxxx>]

Or even X20 !

G.
-------------+-----------------------------+----------------+--------------------
(Embedded    Gareth Cook                  Office:  +44    Work:
image moved  Senior Engineering           (0) 1784 445    gcook@xxxxxxx
to file:     Specialist                   166             Personal:
pic16565.jpg GeT IT                       Mobile:  +44    g@xxxxxxx
)            Engineering,Networks,Securit (0) 7980 445    AOL AIM : theboyg
y                            166             Pager :
IBM SWG, Lotus Park,         Fax:      +44   gpage.csc1@xxxxxxx
Staines, TW18 3AG            (0) 1784 499    m
166
-------------+-----------------------------+----------------+--------------------



----- Forwarded by Gareth Cook/STA/Lotus on 13/06/2001 12:15 -----
----------------------------------------+--------------------------------
Discussion                              .
Main Topic

"Mark McCall"
<mark@xxxxxxx>
Today 12:03

----------------------------------------+--------------------------------

Subje Re: [ukha_d]
ct:   Protocol Name
.
.

Categ
ory:







More like X110 !

:-)

M.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Harrison" <Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 11:25 AM
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Protocol Name


> Well said, Graham.
>
> I would like to submit the following name....
>
>
> X11
>
>
> :-)
>
>
>
> Mark Harrison
> IT Controller, eKingfisher
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Graham Howe [mailto:graham@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 12 June 2001 13:32
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Protocol Name
>
>
> Am I the only one who thinks accronyms are a bit naff. Why is it
necessary
> to have the project name spell out some words that might be loosely
> connected. Take HomeVision for example or Comfort, they are reasonable
names
> without all this faffing about. I selected Solarfish for my company
because
> it was simple, unique on the internet (though some sod be me to it for
a
> yahoo ID), usually spelt correctly when read out over the phone and
fairly
> easy to make into a logo. Whether you like the end result or not I
don't
> really care, but the point is that these things could be more
important
than
> getting it to actually spell out something. Just IMHO of course.
>
> Graham
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________
> Automated Home UK
> http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> ____________________________________
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
> MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit
> http://www.messagelabs.com/stats.asp
>
>
>
> ____________________________________
> Automated Home UK
> http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> ____________________________________
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>




____________________________________
Automated Home UK
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
____________________________________

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




____________________________________
Automated Home UK
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
____________________________________

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

pic16565.jpg