The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Protocol Name



Well said, Graham.

I would like to submit the following name....


X11


:-)



Mark Harrison
IT Controller, eKingfisher
-----Original Message-----
From: Graham Howe [mailto:graham@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 12 June 2001 13:32
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Protocol Name


Am I the only one who thinks accronyms are a bit naff. Why is it necessary
to have the project name spell out some words that might be loosely
connected. Take HomeVision for example or Comfort, they are reasonable
names
without all this faffing about. I selected Solarfish for my company because
it was simple, unique on the internet (though some sod be me to it for a
yahoo ID), usually spelt correctly when read out over the phone and fairly
easy to make into a logo. Whether you like the end result or not I don't
really care, but the point is that these things could be more important
than
getting it to actually spell out something. Just IMHO of course.

Graham




____________________________________
Automated Home UK
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
____________________________________

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit
http://www.messagelabs.com/stats.asp



____________________________________
Automated Home UK
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
____________________________________

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.