[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: [Development] Lights functions required
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: Re: [Development] Lights functions required
- From: "james" <James@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001 23:31:32 +0100
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- References: <9g3cvq+8khs@xxxxxxx>
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
If I remember correctly on a standard lighting desk 70% on the fader is 50%
actual brightness. 95%-100% on the fader is un-noticable to the eye as is
0%
to 10%. www.zero88.co.uk (demux48)and www.etcconnect.com (expression desk)
have more info. Dimming curves in theatrical light is usually done on the
desk or the de-multiplexer, the actual dimmers are fairly dumb. The main
reason to use the right curve is for crossfades. If a light fades down in
area A and then up in area B the overall intensity should remain constant,
aka the dipless cross-fade.
As a suggestion could the dimmer be able to sense its load so as to be able
report blown bulb or even incorrect bulb accross the network??
James T
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dr John Tankard" <john@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2001 10:25 PM
Subject: [ukha_d] Re: [Development] Lights functions required
> > I've just checked the manual for my stage dimmers (Light
Processor
> > Paradims), and they have the options of linear (I assume by
time),
> and
> > square law (which is the conversion for power). I'm pretty sure
that
> > this is all that most professional lighting dimmers offer -
> > manufacturers web sites for people like Avolites or Celco will
> probably
> > have more details. The square law certainly looks linear enough
to
> my
> > eyes.
>
> Tel us more...
>
> The square law, I thought was about distance from the source.
>
> This sounds interesting.
>
> My current prototype integrates the sine wave to power, but its not
> linear to my eyes, at the low end its way off, having said that its
> better than the x10 units.
>
> John
>
>
>
>
> ____________________________________
> Automated Home UK
> http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> ____________________________________
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
____________________________________
Automated Home UK
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
____________________________________
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|